Network ban in Manipur: A double-edged sword
|
MA Hashim
The recent network ban in Manipur, imposed by the state government, has left many citizens frustrated and concerned. While the intention behind the ban is to maintain law and order, it has inadvertently affected innocent citizens and restricted their freedom of expression.
The ban, which has been in place for several days, has disrupted the lives of many people in Manipur. Students are unable to access online resources for their studies, businesses are struggling to operate without internet connectivity, and citizens are unable to stay informed about current events.
Moreover, the ban has also affected essential services such as online banking, e-commerce, and telemedicine. Patients are unable to consult with doctors online, and businesses are struggling to make transactions.
The network ban has also raised concerns about freedom of expression and access to information. In today's digital age, the internet has become an essential tool for communication, information, and self-expression. By banning internet services, the government is inadvertently restricting the rights of citizens to express themselves and access information.
It is understandable that the government wants to curb 'situation' and maintain law and order. However, banning internet services is not the solution. Instead, the government should focus on identifying and punishing the perpetrators of violence and wrongdoing.
Furthermore, the government should also engage with citizens and stakeholders to find alternative solutions to address the issues facing the state. This could include increasing surveillance, improving law enforcement, and promoting community engagement.
In conclusion, while the intention behind the network ban in Manipur may be good, the implementation has been flawed. The government should reconsider the ban and explore alternative solutions that do not restrict the rights of innocent citizens. The people of Manipur deserve better, and it is the responsibility of the government to ensure that their rights are protected.
The recent network ban in Manipur, imposed by the state government, has left many citizens frustrated and concerned. While the intention behind the ban is to maintain law and order, it has inadvertently affected innocent citizens and restricted their freedom of expression.
The ban, which has been in place for several days, has disrupted the lives of many people in Manipur. Students are unable to access online resources for their studies, businesses are struggling to operate without internet connectivity, and citizens are unable to stay informed about current events.
Moreover, the ban has also affected essential services such as online banking, e-commerce, and telemedicine. Patients are unable to consult with doctors online, and businesses are struggling to make transactions.
The network ban has also raised concerns about freedom of expression and access to information. In today's digital age, the internet has become an essential tool for communication, information, and self-expression. By banning internet services, the government is inadvertently restricting the rights of citizens to express themselves and access information.
It is understandable that the government wants to curb 'situation' and maintain law and order. However, banning internet services is not the solution. Instead, the government should focus on identifying and punishing the perpetrators of violence and wrongdoing.
Furthermore, the government should also engage with citizens and stakeholders to find alternative solutions to address the issues facing the state. This could include increasing surveillance, improving law enforcement, and promoting community engagement.
In conclusion, while the intention behind the network ban in Manipur may be good, the implementation has been flawed. The government should reconsider the ban and explore alternative solutions that do not restrict the rights of innocent citizens. The people of Manipur deserve better, and it is the responsibility of the government to ensure that their rights are protected.